The following provisions of the new Management Agreement are of particular
interest:
Art. 2: "The term of this Management Agreement shall be for
fifteen (15) years . . . " [amended to 10 years at Audubon Commission meeting]
Art. 4: "The Commission does hereby agree that
the Institute shall . . . undertake complete operation, management and
control, subject to the reserved rights of the responsibility of the
Commission . . . "
Art. 4.1 The rights and responsibilities and duties
of the Institute . . . shall be:
Art. 4.1.1 The Institute shall:
(1)
manage, operate, develop, improve and provide all services for the Audubon
Facilities, including fundraising on behalf of the Commission, except as
limited in this Management Agreement;
(6) provide
administrative, marketing, public relations and membership services, as
required for the proper operation of the Facilities;
(8) provide food
and beverage service and such other services as may be required
to maintain and operate the Audubon Facilities and in an efficient,
business-like and economical manner."
Art. 4.1.11: "The Institute agrees
not to permit more than five (5%) of the total square footage of
the Audubon Facilities and [sic] to be leased, sub-leased, or otherwise
used by a non-governmental unit . . . "
Art. 4.25: "Written approval
by the Commission must be given to the Institute for any physical improvments
at the Audubon Facilities, having a cost in excess of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND AND NO/100 ($ 250,000) DOLLARS."
[Amended to $150,000 at Audubon Commission meeting]
Art. 4.2.7: "The Commission
agrees to employ as its Chief Executive Officer/Secretary, the
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Institute."
Art. 18: Disputes between Institute and Commission to be resolved by binding
arbitration.
Art. 27: ". . . the Institute shall have the right
to engage in any business so long as it is not in conflict with this
Management Agreement. "
Our questions:
Can they simply "hire" a CEO, and does this mean he is or is not
a member of the Audubon Commission?
Is this a contract that they can enter into without abrogating the Charter with
respect to appointing Commission members?
Also, Section 4.1.12 of the
contract states that "The Institute agrees not to employ as its CEO any
person who is a member of the Commission." Isn't that what they're doing
here?
The City Charter provides as follows ("board" and "Commission"
are synonymous):
- Section 9-106. Prohibited Activities of Board
Members.
(1) No member or officer of a board shall borrow money or
receive anything of value from any contractor doing business with the
board under the penalty of dismissal from the board. No member, officer,
or employee of any board shall have any interest in any contract let by
the board. Any member of any board who is a director or stockholder in
any corporation or who is an agent or attorney for any person who is
financially interested in any subject before the board shall reveal such
interest to the board and shall not discuss or vote on the subject at
any meeting of the board or any of its committees.
Clearly, if Forman
is a member of the Audubon Commission, he is prohibited from contracting with the Audubon Nature Institute, so long as
he is also the CEO of the Institute. This appears to be the type of self-dealing
the Charter seeks to prohibit.
The Charter also
provides:
- Section 4-206. Powers and Duties.
(1) Executive and
Administrative Powers. The Mayor shall be the chief executive officer of
the City. The Mayor shall have the power and shall be required to:
Appoint, with approval of a majority of all members of the Council, members
of all boards except as otherwise provided in this Charter or by applicable
state or municipal law.
|