Ms. Jane Booth
Chair
City Planning Commission
1300 Perdido Street
New Orleans, LA 70112
Dear Ms. Booth:
It has come to the attention of interested members of the Master Plan Citizen Advisory Committee that the Audubon Nature
Institute’s golf course plans recently approved by the Audubon Commission on October 24th were
received by the City Planning Commission, but there is uncertainty about whether or not they
have been reviewed for conformity with the Master Plan, as required and stated
in section 5-404(3) of the Home Rule Charter.
In as much as the 1992 New Century New Orleans Master Policy Plan does not provide much clarity
about the scale of importance of professional review and public scrutiny of all plans affecting
the use of land in the city, we fully appreciate that the Blueprint for the
New Century New Orleans Master Plan, adopted as a draft directive by the City Planning Commission
in 1999, corrects this deficiency with numerous references to the necessity for integration
of all plans pertaining to the Master Plan’s elements and public accountability in the planning
process and performance of services. Whether or not the golf course plans have been reviewed yet,
we believe that the issue of public comment on these plans has to be addressed by the
City Planning Commission regarding this matter.
This matter is of utmost concern to us now, because I was advised by Collette Creppell, Planning Commission Executive Director,
that the Audubon Commission, the Audubon Nature Institute’s client, was created by state legislative act
and therefore is not a public body directly answerable to the city’s administrative, legislative or
policing powers. But the very existence of the park and its management is inseparable from the city
itself, and therefore its planning and the city’s planning are likewise incapable of being conducted
in a manner discrete from each other. Indeed, the actions taken by the Audubon Commission and
its management entity the Audubon Nature Institute in the development and implementation of its
golf course plan go directly to the heart of the central issue that has informed the entire body
of work performed by the Planning Commission and the Master Plan Citizen Advisory Committee
for nearly four years and hundreds of hours in developing the Master Plan Blueprint.
To the point, can planning in New Orleans be integrated, open to maximum feasible citizen
participation, and based on a rational assessment of needs and publicly enunciated goals
about our city if the Planning Commission does not review the golf course plans to determine
their relationship to these three imperatives?
Whatever the Audubon Commission’s legal relationship to the city, there are strong, compelling
arguments for this needed review in the very nature of the strategy for revising the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance approved by the City Planning Commission in 1995. This strategy relied
on the development of a land use plan based on public input workshops conducted in 1998,
resulting in the Land Use Plan adopted by the Planning Commission and the City Council in 1999.
The Land Use Plan makes numerous references to the preservation of multiple use green space
in all parks, including Audubon. If the Land Use Plan is the cornerstone of both the new
Zoning Ordinance draft currently being developed and of the goals of the Master Plan Blueprint
and its elements, then it is unavoidable to conclude that all planned projects by the
Audubon Commission and the Audubon Nature Institute involving the use of city land for park
use are subject to review by the Planning Commission. Also noteworthy is the clearly stated
intent of the City Council, referenced in the statement of intentions in the Purposes Section
of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance currently being drafted, to have the zoning regulations
implement both the Master Plan and the 1999 Land Use Plan.
The City cannot assess the nature of the current golf course project’s relationship to city planning
without reviewing the project plans, and if the city does not review the plan in question,
then it inevitably follows that the Master Plan that is approaching completion in 2002 will
be rendered useless as a Master Plan that was intended to address the shortcomings of the 1992
Master Plan as described earlier.
When asked by the Planning Commission to step up and defend the strategy for drafting the
Zoning Ordinance and Master Plan this past summer, the Master Plan Citizen Advisory Committee
did not hesitate to do so because it recognized the importance of how the strategy addressed
our city’s pressing needs along with developing a democratically based planning process for the future.
Now, interested members of the Advisory Committee ask the Planning Commission to schedule
at the earliest practical opportunity a review of the golf course plan as adopted by the
Audubon Commission in order to determine its compatibility with the Blueprint for the
New Century New Orleans Master Plan and its foundation instrument, the 1999 Land Use Plan.
Please advise us on how the Commission intends to address this planning issue.
Sincerely,
James A. Segreto
Elizabeth Sewell
Maurice P. Brungardt
|