For seven weeks, the City Council deferred consideration of Resolution 02-192, by which the City
Council would have directed the City Planning Commission to review the Audubon Park redevelopment
plan for conformity with the city's Master Plan and its publicly stated goals regarding citizen
input and participation.
The decision Thursday by Councilman Batt to withdraw the resolution, one supported by thousands
of citizens and many organizations, raises questions about his commitment or the advice he has
been given about the necessity for a city Master Plan that is integrated, open to maximum
feasible citizen participation, and based on a rational assessment of needs and publicly
enunciated goals.
Using one excuse after another, like the tone and language of SaveAudubonPark.org’s website and
demanding the names of its authors, then relying on a misconstruing of the City Charter’s
language, are, in the larger picture really small potatoes, but the City Councilman used
them to avoid making the Audubon Nature Institute, and its governing board the Audubon Commission,
accountable to objective planning standards and responsive to the public interest.
And where is our own Planning Commission in all this? It spends thousands of dollars and asks
hundreds of citizens to spend hundreds of hours in developing a Land Use Plan (adopted by the
Council in 1999!), drafting a new Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance. But when asked repeatedly
since November to evaluate the Audubon Nature Institute’s plans and operations with the same
comprehensive study and provision for thorough public input, it replies first that it did
(but cannot provide the date) and then is says it cannot without direction from the City Council!
The Planning Commission should defend and promote its own work, or it should tear out page 43 of the
1992 Master Plan, pages 90, 95, and the insert map of the new Land Use Plan, pages 65, 77 and 78 of the
Master Plan Blueprint draft, and pages 51, 54, 55, 61, and 63 through 65 of the Parks, Recreation and
Open Space Element of the Master Plan drafted in February.
If the Commission is unwilling to support the substance of its own work, the Council must make
them do it and stop ignoring the eight hundred pound gorilla that manages Audubon Park. Demonstrating
political support for such reforms will have implications not only for Audubon Park, but City
Park and other open space facilities.
|